I’ve ranted a lot about how awesome I think Ubuntu is. It’s a super, user-friendly Linux alternative to Mac and Windows. One of the benefits that I like to emphasize when I try to persuade someone that they should consider Linux has to do with social justice. There is good reason to believe that Linux [...]
Filed under: ethics, open source by Andrew Cullison
No Comments »
Attention Philosophers of Religion and Theologians: You’ve been asking the wrong questions! You’ve been asking, “Why is there something rather than nothing?” You should have been asking, “Why is there Bill O’Reilly, rather than no Bill O’Reilly?” Surely the fool must admit that there is a God when he reflects on that question! I kid [...]
Filed under: fun, philosophy of religion by Andrew Cullison
1 Comment »
[UPDATE: Here's the new version of the paper] “Moral Perception” has just been accepted for publication in the European Journal of Philosophy. As Clayton once so eloquently put it - Huzzah! I have to make some stylistic changes. When I do that I’ll post a draft of the paper. For now, I’ll give you a [...]
Filed under: ethics, metaethics, papers, philosophy by Andrew Cullison
5 Comments »
I’ve been posting about the controversial law suit that Thomson Reuters (EndNote makers) have filed against the makers of Zotero here and here. Ironically, I just received a request from Thomson Reuters to participate in Market Research today. I thought it was worth reminding other academics who might receive this request that Thomson Reuters is [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized by Andrew Cullison
1 Comment »
Filed under: Uncategorized by Andrew Cullison
No Comments »
UPDATE: The bounty has been met. Now we’re just waiting on the development of the module. Good news. The software that I’m using to run Sympoze should be getting an external vote button module. There’s a bounty out now for the button, and it looks like we’ll probably scrounge up enough money for the developer [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized by Andrew Cullison
No Comments »